Thinking Fast and Slow By Daniel Kahneman. Penguin. 2012. £10.99 (pb). 512 pp. ISBN 9780141033570.
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Thinking, Fast and Slow, by D. Kahneman
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date...
متن کاملQnAs with Daniel Kahneman.
The science of human decision-making has long been a stronghold of psychologists. Among the voices that abound in the literature on how people make choices, one scholarly voice has remained strident through several decades. By studying human behavior through the lens of economics, Princeton University psychologist Daniel Kahneman has shown how inherent biases might influence our choices, overtl...
متن کاملWhat Kahneman Means for Lawyers: Some Reflections on Thinking, Fast and Slow
INTRODUCTION As academic lawyers, we are meant to extol rational thinking. After all, one of the main purposes of law school is to enable students to “think like a lawyer,” meaning logically, rationally, and unencumbered by “emotion” or irrelevant considerations. Law and economics is similar—it is predicated upon the premise that “economic man” acts rationally and consistently. In the case of l...
متن کاملThinking slow about thinking fast
In his book, Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman attributes experientially-learned real-world coping skills to an " associative machine " acting on declarative memories of facts and events. While this attribution is probably correct for the unfamiliar types of situations that are the subject of his famous experiments conducted with Amos Tversky, we argue that experientially-learned real-wo...
متن کاملChapter 11 Living , and thinking about it : two perspectives on life Daniel Kahneman and Jason Riis
It is a common assumption of everyday conversation that people can provide accurate answers to questions about their feelings, both past (e.g. 'How was your vacation?') and current (e.g. 'Does this hurt?'). Although the distinction is mostly ignored, the two kinds of questions are vastly different. Introspective evaluations of past episodes depend on two achievements that are not required for r...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The British Journal of Psychiatry
سال: 2018
ISSN: 0007-1250,1472-1465
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2018.109